Elections

PA Senate, Gov. Wolf, secretaries of state jockey over redistricting

State Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman - from his website

State Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman - from his website

The Senate State Government Committee on Monday unanimously advanced a vehicle bill for any redistricting plan that may or may not be agreed to in the coming days.

The positioning of the bill was said to be important due to the tight timeline given by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court: the General Assembly has until Feb. 9 to get a new map to the governor based on the criteria used for the drawing of state legislative districts to prevent the court from using a newly appointed special master to draw a court-approved map based on non-partisan criteria.

The bill, Senate Bill 1034, sponsored by Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati (R-Jefferson) and Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman (R-Centre), is a shell by design.

As approved by the committee on Monday, the bill essentially just strikes out the current legislative districts and reserves the section to be refilled at a later date.

According to legislative sources, there is currently no agreement on any map that would redraw the Commonwealth’s 2011 congressional map and the bill was not necessarily drafted in anticipation of a pre-deadline agreement.

“The intent of this bill is obviously to move the process. There is no sleight of hand or trickery,” Sen. Scarnati said about the legislation Monday. “What we have gotten is a bad opinion from the state Supreme Court with an unconstitutional remedy. So, we are moving the bill; it's a shell bill to move the process in order to accommodate the bad decision and we will address the unconstitutional remedy.”

Others were palpably frustrated, especially State Government Committee Majority Chairman Mike Folmer (R-Lebanon), who said the litigation resulting in the current redistricting process put on hold ongoing reform efforts he was planning on addressing this session absent court intervention.

“Redistricting reform has long been a goal of mine and I was looking forward to scheduling hearings of the State Government Committee across the Commonwealth on proposed bills to change how we redistrict,” he said. “However, one of the advocacy groups chose to file a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the 2011 lines. While this was their right, it led to the postponement of hearings on potential redistricting reform.”

He said closed-door discussions with advocacy groups left him additionally frustrated as they failed to answer some of his more pressing questions about reform bills currently introduced in the General Assembly, particularly what happens if a citizens’ commission cannot agree to a map, and a special master has to step in and create a map to a court’s satisfaction.

“How is having one person decide how those maps are drawn be considered reform?” he asked. “Thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, we may soon have that answer...I hope nobody tries to tell me that that’s reform. Here we are, faced with an unreasonable timeline that does not allow us for openness and transparency, no details as to what lines might look like, little rationale for how the court felt like the Constitution was violated or how it might evaluate if any new maps meet its currently secret definition of what’s constitutional – and the distinct possibility that one person might be redrawing Pennsylvania’s congressional maps. If this is the reform those who have been scorching me in the press and on social media want, then we’ll see.”

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court announced on Friday the retention of Nathan Persily, a James B. McClatchy professor of law at Stanford Law School, “as an advisor to assist the court in adopting, if necessary, a remedial congressional redistricting plan.”

According to his Stanford biography, Persily has served as a special master or court-appointed expert to draw congressional and/or legislative districts in Georgia, Maryland, Connecticut, New York and North Carolina.

Sen. Andrew Dinniman (D-Chester) noted, however, it was the secret political process used that was the constitutional flaw in the maps – something that should not be repeated regardless of who draws the new and future maps.

“The way it was done last time gave very little input for the citizens or for the Legislature,” he said. “It was the actions of this Legislature that forced the court to intervene. When we don’t follow the Constitution about congruity about districts, when we have districts that were pushed – like Rep. Meehan's district – that were pushed by certain individuals here...we needed the courts to step in because we didn’t follow the Constitution in the first place.”

The movement of the bill at the state level occurred while the Legislature awaits a potential stay in the enforcement of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s order from the US Supreme Court.

While Sen. Scarnati and Speaker of the House Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) applied for a stay to the nation’s highest court last week, no official stay decision has come down.

Meanwhile, other parties have joined in on that federal litigation through the filing of amicus briefs with the US Supreme Court.

Among them, joining with the Republican legislative leaders in support of a stay, are the Republican Secretaries of State of Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and South Carolina.

Their brief agrees with the Pennsylvania Republican leaders who argued that the state Supreme Court’s order of a map redraw by Feb. 15 could “cause chaos in their states” should similar injunctive relief be granted in similar cases.

“The expectation of voters and candidates will be changed on short notice, and the interests of overseas and uniformed services voters will have to be protected,” they wrote. “Strict federal time limits govern the transmittal of absentee ballots to overseas and uniformed service voters, and amici are legally responsible for compliance with those time limits.”

Also intervening, respective of the other states and each other, were Pennsylvania’s Republican Party and – as a group – Pennsylvania’s Republican congressional delegation.

Delegation members said they believe the stay should be granted since the members and voters already engaged in the current political process will be irreparably harmed by the rapid redraw as outlined in the state supreme court’s order.

“The state court’s directive will forestall and impede the possibility of a full and vigorous campaign in the various congressional districts, which will not only harm the candidacy of many of the Amici Members, but will also significantly hamper the ability of the Amici Members’ constituents and voters to fully engage in the political process,” they wrote.

Gov. Tom Wolf and Lt. Gov. Mike Stack also have attorneys of record listed on the US Supreme Court docket, but have not made any briefs made publicly available.

Last week, in announcing the appointment of his own expert to evaluate any map delivered to him by the Legislature, the governor doubled down on his map expectations.

“I’ve made it very clear: This is our chance to have a fair map – if the US Supreme Court doesn’t issue a stay to the Republicans, then I’m going to have the ability to make sure, finally, we get a fair map with the US House of Representatives seats here in Pennsylvania,” he said. “I’m not willing to play any more games and the people of Pennsylvania are tired of gerrymandering – it’s time to move to a fair map. That’s what I’m dedicated to, that’s what I promised, and that’s what I’m going to deliver.”

 

Jason Gottesman is the Harrisburg Bureau Chief of The PLS Reporter, a news website dedicated to covering Pennsylvania’s government

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.