Philly Controller lays out plan to fix broken sexual harassment system

A central stairwell at Philadelphia City Hall - photo by Max Marin

A central stairwell at Philadelphia City Hall - photo by Max Marin

Philadelphia City Controller Rebecca Rhynhart released a new audit that paints a damning portrait of the city government’s failure to track sexual misconduct complaints, properly train supervisors, and ultimately protect victims of sexual violence in the workplace. 

On Thursday, Rhynhart published the results of a probe into the city’s sexual harassment policies for its 28,000-employee workforce – the second-largest in Pennsylvania – over a six-year period. The findings include evidence that some managers had either concealed or ignored complaints and that the city effectively has no systematic process for punishing elected officials or department heads accused of misconduct.

In tandem with the audit’s release, Mayor Jim Kenney’s office outlined reforms to the city’s beleaguered processes. These reforms include an online submission system for complaints and a central reporting database for human resources departments, which will be overseen by the Mayor’s Office of Labor Relations. 

But Rhynhart says more substantive change is needed – namely a well-staffed, independent agency to investigate complaints of sexual nature across all city agencies and enforce consistent discipline.

“What has been proposed [by the mayor] is an initial step,” Rhynhart said. “Over the next few months, I expect full implementation of the recommendations.”

The city’s troubled record with handling sexual misconduct in the workplace was the subject of a recent Philadelphia Weekly investigation. Records showed less than a quarter of city departments were able to produce any internal HR complaints. Even large, scandal-prone agencies like the 500-employee District Attorney’s Office admitted they had kept no records of complaints at all. 

Rhynhart’s audit confirmed not only the existence of widespread dubious and decentralized record-keeping practices, but also a mystifying process for lodging complaints that varies widely from department to department – and which yields uneven punishment.

The Controller’s audit, which spans April 2012 to June 2018, offers a litany of troubling details:

 

  • The city does not have a policy or procedure for handling complaints when the alleged offender is also the head of a department. The city’s policy states that copies of the completed investigation must be handed over to the cabinet official and department head. As a result, the audit found that “the Mayor’s Office of Labor Relations provided the offending city official with the completed investigation substantiating the claim against him and subsequent disciplinary recommendation.”
  • The audit identified $2.2 million in settlements related to sexual misconduct lawsuits over the last five years, but Rhynhart suspects the number is much higher. (The city previously acknowledged to reporters that its legal record-keeping and categorization process was less than reliable, and shortcomings are being addressed.) 
  • 121 sexual harassment complaints were lodged with departmental HR offices over the six-year period. The complaints included both verbal harassment, physical misconduct and sexual coercion. Investigators substantiated just over half (63) those complaints.
  • As Philly Weekly reported, there is evidence these complaint numbers do not paint the full picture. Rhynhart’s office also opened a hotline for city employees to share their experiences lodging complaints. Those calls suggested many complaints were swept under the rug – or improperly handled. One caller said they were subject to retaliation after filing a complaint against a high-ranking official. Another caller said their complaint was dismissed because the alleged harassment came from a colleague of the same sex. Several callers reported separate incidents involving the same employee.
  • One city worker said they lodged a detailed sexual misconduct complaint with their department’s HR officer, but that same officer later “adamantly informed” the controller’s office that there were “no reported incidents of sexual misconduct in that department” at all.
  • Ineffective training also contributed to “the perfect union of circumstances to expose employees to sexual harassment.” The audit found 59 percent of managers, supervisors and executive staff had not received their mandatory training in the last five years.
  • The current training regimen fails to provide detailed steps on identifying sexually harassing behavior, as well as how to file a complaint: “Currently, only two of 52 [PowerPoint] slides in the sexual harassment prevention training presentation pertain to the technical approach of handling a sexual harassment complaint.”
  • 45 of 50 departments do not have an Equal Employment Opportunity officer, or else the officer’s contact information was not readily available to employees. (The controller’s officer found its own department was at fault and has since taken steps to appoint an EEO officer.)
  • Discipline for sexual misconduct is uneven. The report found five departments (Police, Fire, Streets, Sheriff and Aviation) in which sexual harassment complaints against rank-and-file employees resulted in harsher punishments than the same or objectively less serious complaints against department supervisors.

The 44-page report concludes with a number of recommendations for the city, including several updates to the city’s sexual harassment prevention policy. The Kenney administration is already moving to implement some – but not all – of these items. 

“Every complaint should be investigated in the same manner; there should be uniformity and consistency,” Monica Marchetti-Brock, the director of the Mayor's Office of Labor Relations, told reporters at a briefing in advance of the audit’s release.

Over the coming months, the administration is rolling out a new database solely for logging and tracking sexual misconduct complaints across the city’s 50 major departments. The Employee Relations Unit, a three-employee division within the Office of Labor Relations, will be tasked with training individual HR units and monitoring the database.

A new submission system will also allow city employees to lodge complaints from their phones. Additionally, the city has expanded sexual harassment training to all incoming employees and ramped up efforts to educate workers on the complaint filing process.

But Rhynhart is calling for far more thoroughly centralized reforms.

The audit recommends expanding the Office of Labor Relations into a well-staffed agency that can independently receive and investigate all sexual misconduct claims from city departments. While departmental cultures vary, the controller says certain HR departments cannot be trusted to fairly handle such cases, citing the Philadelphia Police Department’s Internal Affairs Division’s checkered history handling complaints made by female officers against their male colleagues.

“Our recommendation is that Internal Affairs shouldn’t be doing this [type of investigation] anymore,” Rhynhart said. “There’s too much conflict of interest having this being done within the department.” 

However, the Kenney administration says it currently has no plans to expand the Office of Labor Relations, officials said. 

Union arbitration also creates a barrier to consistent punishment. City employees found guilty of verbal or physical harassment are often given short suspensions. Some who have been fired or demoted for misconduct can be reinstated through the arbitration process. Even in high-profile cases that result in six- or seven-figure legal settlements – most of which stem from the Philadelphia Police Department – the offending officers remain on the job today.  

But Rhynhart says unions should not bear the full blame.

“The unions want to protect their workers,” Rhynhart said. “What I have really learned from this audit is that many things that are blamed on the union are truly fixable by the administration. I only say that to say it’s more complicated and systematic than to blame one actor.” 

Rhynhart added that FOP Lodge 5 President John McNesby, who represents the city’s uniformed police officers, is on board with the centralization proposals. 

McNesby could not be reached for comment.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.